Template:FGAN

Failed "good article" nomination
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of, , compares against the  six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?:
 * 2. Factually accurate?:
 * 3. Broad in coverage?:
 * 4. Neutral point of view?:
 * 5. Article stability?
 * 6. Images?:

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far.

Usage summary
— ~