The Living Guidelines: UA/NSTEMI Recomendations for PCI Polling Results for CLASS IIa Guidelines


 * Class IIa

1. Percutaneous coronary intervention is reasonable for focal saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions or multiple stenoses in UA/NSTEMI patients who are undergoing medical therapy and who are poor candidates for reoperative surgery. (Level of Evidence: C)

 CLASS IIa, Recommendation 1 for PCI in UA/NSTEMI should be: CLASS I CLASS IIa CLASS IIb CLASS III

2. Percutaneous coronary intervention (or CABG) is reasonable for UA/NSTEMI patients with 1- or 2-vessel CAD with or without significant proximal left anterior descending CAD but with a moderate area of viable myocardium and ischemia on noninvasive testing. (Level of Evidence: B)

 CLASS IIa, Recommendation 2 for PCI in UA/NSTEMI should be: CLASS I CLASS IIa CLASS IIb CLASS III

3. Percutaneous coronary intervention (or CABG) can be beneficial compared with medical therapy for UA/NSTEMI patients with 1-vessel disease with significant proximal left anterior descending CAD. (Level of Evidence: B)

 CLASS IIa, Recommendation 3 for PCI in UA/NSTEMI should be: CLASS I CLASS IIa CLASS IIb CLASS III

4. Use of PCI is reasonable in patients with UA/NSTEMI with significant left main CAD (greater than 50% diameter stenosis) who are candidates for revascularization but are not eligible for CABG or who require emergent intervention at angiography for hemodynamic instability. (Level of Evidence: B)

 CLASS IIa, Recommendation 4 for PCI in UA/NSTEMI should be: CLASS I CLASS IIa CLASS IIb CLASS III