Template:WP SCOTUS/doc

Usage
These are the various options for each field using this template. Note: capitalization is unimportant (i.e. GA is the same as Ga or ga), though capitals are preferred.

Unassessed articles

 * The following articles need to be assessed: Category:Unassessed U.S. Supreme Court articles

Script

 * The following script User talk:Outriggr/metadatatest.js can be used to assess articles with ease.

Priority scale
Priority must be regarded as a relative term. If priority values are applied within this project, these only reflect the perceived importance to this project and to the work groups the biography falls under. An article judged to be "Top-Class" in one context may be only "Mid-Class" in another project. The criteria used for rating article priority are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it).

Infobox status

 * Yes, if an infobox is needed
 * No, optional for pages that contain a complete and accurate infobox

Flagged status

 * Yes, use this if there is an issue with the page that needs to be addressed by members of WikiProject SCOTUS. Also, it is helpful to add a few lines about the issue on the talk page of the specific case article.