Libertarians for Life

Libertarians For Life is a non-sectarian pro-life group expressing an opposition to abortion within the context of libertarianism. It expresses a non-religious and non-sectarian perspective that abortion is a violation of liberty.

Literature
The website of the Libertarians for Life offers a wide variety of materials on most of the mainstream arguments of abortion, and many of the obscure arguments. All of the arguments are either neutral to the ideology of libertarianism or supportive of it. Indeed, many of the articles argue that opposition to abortion is not only compatible with being a libertarian, but even follows from the acceptance of libertarian principles.

The Libertarian Case Against Abortion
To explain and defend its case, LFL argues that:
 * 1)  Human offspring are human beings, persons from fertilization.
 * 2)  Abortion is homicide — the killing of one person by another.
 * 3)  There is never a right to kill an innocent person. Prenatally, we are all innocent persons.
 * 4)  A prenatal child has the right to be in the mother's body. Parents have no right to evict their children from the crib or from the womb and let them die. Instead both parents, the father as well as the mother, owe them support and protection from harm.
 * 5)  No government, nor any individual, has a just power to legally depersonify any one of us, born or preborn.
 * 6)  The proper purpose of the law is to side with the innocent, not against them.

None of the arguments are based upon religious belief, and are intended to appeal equally to atheists and theists. This is a point of pride for the group, relying on science and reason while both pro-life allies and pro-choice opponents use what they view as non-scientific or unreasoned arguments.

Activities
Doris Gordon founded the Libertarians For Life caucus in 1976 "because some libertarian had to blow the whistle." The primary purpose of the Libertarians For Life is to push the Libertarian Party toward a more neutral or more pro-life view on abortion, and to improve the section on the rights of children. They seek to do the same to state affiliates of the LP.

While they have achieved limited successes, including converting several state LP platforms to neutral or pro-life positions and adopting a more pro-life friendly plank on children's' rights, LFL has not been able to move the party to oppose abortion.

The Libertarian Party on abortion
The current U.S. national party platform reads:


 * "Recognizing that abortion is a very sensitive issue and that people, including libertarians, can hold good-faith views on both sides, we believe the government should be kept out of the question. We condemn state-funded and state-mandated abortions. It is particularly harsh to force someone who believes that abortion is murder to pay for another's abortion."

Although many people view this as a neutral position on the issue, the Libertarians For Life argue that it uses the power of the state through courts and police to protect those committing abortion and therefore cannot be a neutral position. The only 'neutral' position, they argue, would involve an unlikely and unattractive scenario of "free-fire zones" where government would neither stop abortions for occurring, nor protect abortionists from harm. As this is obviously not a situation even most libertarians would endorse, the result is to accept that any position taken by the government on the issue of abortion necessarily takes sides.

Harry Browne, the LP candidate for President in 1996 and 2000 said he was personally very strongly opposed to abortion but politically did not feel he could or should be able to prohibit it. Michael Badnarik, the LP candidate for President in 2004, was somewhat undecided on abortion - at first siding with the child's right to life over the mother's right to privacy (in his words, roughly) and subsequently endorsing a much more mainstream libertarian opinion securing the right to choose abortion, but not to acquire one through state funding or assistance. Gary Nolan, the presumptive LP candidate in 2004 early in the primaries is also pro-life, though it's unclear to what extent he would've sought to press his views if elected.

Ron Paul, by far the most prominent elected libertarian, representing Texas in the House of Representatives as a Republican, and the Libertarian party's 1988 candidate for President is and was pro-life. He was a practicing OB/GYN for many years and delivered many babies, which he cites as contributing to his opposition to abortion.

Gary Cherone is also a pro-life libertarian.