Cancer stem cell
You don't need to be Editor-In-Chief to add or edit content to WikiDoc. You can begin to add to or edit text on this WikiDoc page by clicking on the edit button at the top of this page. Next enter or edit the information that you would like to appear here. Once you are done editing, scroll down and click the Save page button at the bottom of the page.
|
WikiDoc Resources for Cancer stem cell | |
|
Articles | |
|---|---|
|
Most recent articles on Cancer stem cell Most cited articles on Cancer stem cell | |
|
Media | |
|
Powerpoint slides on Cancer stem cell | |
|
Evidence Based Medicine | |
|
Clinical Trials | |
|
Ongoing Trials on Cancer stem cell at Clinical Trials.gov Trial results on Cancer stem cell Clinical Trials on Cancer stem cell at Google
| |
|
Guidelines / Policies / Govt | |
|
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Cancer stem cell NICE Guidance on Cancer stem cell
| |
|
Books | |
|
News | |
|
Commentary | |
|
Definitions | |
|
Patient Resources / Community | |
|
Patient resources on Cancer stem cell Discussion groups on Cancer stem cell Patient Handouts on Cancer stem cell Directions to Hospitals Treating Cancer stem cell Risk calculators and risk factors for Cancer stem cell
| |
|
Healthcare Provider Resources | |
|
Causes & Risk Factors for Cancer stem cell | |
|
Continuing Medical Education (CME) | |
|
International | |
|
| |
|
Businness | |
|
Experimental / Informatics | |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Phone:617-525-6884
Please Take Over This Page and Apply to be Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [2] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.
Overview
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a sub-population of cancer cells (found within tumors or hematological cancers) that possess characteristics normally associated with stem cells. These cells are believed to be tumorigenic (tumor-forming), in contrast to the bulk of cancer cells, which are thought to be non-tumorigenic. CSCs have stem cell properties such as self-renewal and the ability to differentiate into multiple cell types. A theory suggests such cells persist in tumors as a distinct population and cause relapse and metastasis by giving rise to new tumours. Development of specific therapies targeted at cancer stem cells holds hope for improvement of survival and quality of life of cancer patients, especially for sufferers of metastatic disease.
Image:Cancer stem cells text resized.svg
Existing cancer treatments were mostly developed on animal models, where therapies able to promote tumor shrinkage were deemed effective. However, animals could not provide a complete model of human disease. In particular, in mice, whose life spans do not exceed two years, tumor relapse is exceptionally difficult to study.
The efficacy of cancer treatments are, in the initial stages of testing, often measured by the amount of tumour mass they kill off. As cancer stem cells would form a very small proportion of the tumour, this may not necessarily select for drugs that act specifically on the stem cells. The theory suggests that conventional chemotherapies kill differentiated or differentiating cells, which form the bulk of the tumor but are unable to generate new cells. A population of cancer stem cells, which gave rise to it, could remain untouched and cause a relapse of the disease.
Evidence for cancer stem cells
Opponents of the paradigm do not deny the existence of cancer stem cells as such. Cancer cells must be capable of continuous proliferation and self-renewal in order to retain the many mutations required for carcinogenesis, and to sustain the growth of a tumor since differentiated cells cannot divide indefinitely (constrained by the Hayflick Limit). However, it is debated whether such cells represent a minority. If most cells of the tumor are endowed with stem cell properties there is no incentive to focusing on a specific subpopulation. There is also debate on the cell of origin of these cancer stem cells - whether they originate from stem cells that have lost the ability to regulate proliferation, or from more differentiated population of progenitor cells that have acquired abilities to self-renew (which is related to the issue of stem cell plasticity).
The first conclusive evidence for cancer stem cells was published in 1997 in Nature Medicine. Bonnet and Dick[1] isolated a subpopulation of leukaemic cells that express a specific surface marker CD34, but lacks the CD38 marker. The authors established that the CD34+/CD38- subpopulation is capable of initiating tumors in NOD/SCID mice that is histologically similar to the donor. (Matsui, 2004)
In cancer research experiments, tumor cells are sometimes injected into an experimental animal to establish a tumor. Disease progression is then followed in time and novel drugs can be tested for their ability to inhibit it. However, efficient tumor formation requires thousands or tens of thousands of cells to be introduced. Classically, this has been explained by poor methodology (i.e. the tumor cells lose their viability during transfer) or the critical importance of the microenvironment, the particular biochemical surroundings of the injected cells. Supporters of the cancer stem cell paradigm argue that only a small fraction of the injected cells, the cancer stem cells, have the potential to generate a tumor. In human acute myeloid leukemia the frequency of these cells is less than 1 in 10,000.[1]
Further evidence comes from histology, the study of tissue structure of tumors. Many tumors are very heterogeneous and contain multiple cell types native to the host organ. Heterogeneity is commonly retained by tumor metastases. This implies that the cell that produced them had the capacity to generate multiple cell types. In other words, it possessed multidifferentiative potential, a classical hallmark of stem cells.[1]
The existence of leukaemic stem cells prompted further research into other types of cancer. Cancer stem cells have recently been identified in several solid tumours, including:
Importance of stem cells
Not only is finding the source of cancer cells necessary for successful treatments, but if current treatments of cancer do not properly destroy enough cancer stem cells, the tumor will reappear. Including the possibility that the treatment of for instance, chemotherapy, will leave only chemotherapy-resistant cancer stem cells, then the ensuing tumor will most likely also be resistant to chemotherapy. If the cancer tumor is detected early enough, enough of the tumor can be killed off and marginalized with traditional treatment. But as the tumor size increases, it becomes more and more difficult to remove the tumor without conferring resistance and leaving enough behind for the tumor to reappear.
Some treatments with chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel in ovarian cancer (a cancer usually discovered in late stages), may actually serve to promote certain cancer growth (55-75% relapse <2 years[1]). It potentially does this by destroying only the cancer cells susceptible to the drug (targeting those that are CD44-positive, a trait which has been associated with increased survival time in some ovarian cancers), and allowing the cells which are unaffected by paclitaxel (CD44-negative) to regrow, even after a reduction in over a third of the total tumor size.[1] There are studies, though, which show how paclitaxel can be used in combination with other ligands to affect the CD44-positive cells.[1] While paclitaxel alone, as of late, does not cure the cancer, it is effective at extending the survival time of the patients.[1]
Mechanistic and mathematical models
Once the pathways to cancer are hypothesized, it is possible to develop predictive mathematical biology models,[1] e.g., based on the cell compartment method. For instance, the growths of the abnormal cells from their normal counterparts can be denoted with specific mutation probabilities. Such a model has been employed to predict that repeated insult to mature cells increases the formation of abnormal progeny, and hence the risk of cancer.[1] Considerable work needs to be done, however, before the clinical efficacy of such models is established.
Where do cancer stem cells come from?
This is still an area of ongoing research. Logically, the smallest change (and hence the most likely mutation) to produce a cancer stem cell would be a mutation from a normal stem cell. Also, in tissues with a high rate of cell turnover (such as the skin or GI epithelium, where cancers are common), it can be argued that stem cells are the only cells that live long enough to acquire enough genetic abnormalities to become cancerous. However it is still possible that more differentiated cancer cells (in which the genome is less stable) could acquire properties of 'stemness'.
It is likely that in a tumour there are several lines of stem cells, with new ones being created and others dying off as a tumour grows and adapts to its surroundings.[1] Hence, tumour stem cells can constitute a 'moving target', making them even harder to treat.
Implications on Cancer Treatment
The existence of cancer stem cells have several implications in terms of future cancer treatment and therapies. These include disease identification, selective drug targets, prevention of metastasis, and development of new strategies in fighting cancer.
Normal somatic stem cells are naturally resistant to chemotherapeutic agents - they have various pumps (such as MDR) that pump out drugs, DNA repair proteins and they also have a slow rate of cell turnover (chemotherapeutic agents naturally target rapidly replicating cells). Cancer stem cells, being the mutated counterparts of normal stem cells, may also have similar functions which allows them to survive therapy. These surviving cancer stem cells then repopulates the tumour, causing relapse. By selectively targeting cancer stem cells, it would be possible to treat patients with aggressive, non-resectable tumours, as well as preventing the tumour from metastasizing. The hypothesis infers that if the cancer stem cells are eliminated, the cancer would simply regress due to differentiation and cell death.
There has also been a lot of research into finding specific markers which may distinguish cancer stem cells from the bulk of the tumour (as well as from normal stem cells), with some success.[1] Proteomic and genomic signatures of tumours are also being investigated. Success in these area would enable faster identification of tumour subtypes, as well as enable personalized medicine in cancer treatments by using the right combination of drugs and/or treatments to efficiently eliminate the tumour.
Cancer stem cell pathways
A normal stem cell may be transformed into a cancer stem cell through disregulation of the proliferation and differentiation pathways controlling it. Scientists working on cancer stem cells hope to design new drugs targeting these cellular mechanisms. The first findings in this area were made using haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and their transformed counterparts in leukemia, the disease whose stem cell origin is most strongly established. However, these pathways appear to be shared by stem cells of all organs.
Bmi-1
The Polycomb group transcriptional repressor Bmi-1 was discovered as a common oncogene activated in lymphoma[1] and later shown to specifically regulate HSCs.[1] The role of Bmi-1 has also been illustrated in neural stem cells.[1] The pathway appears to be active in cancer stem cells of pediatric brain tumors.[1]
Notch
The Notch pathway has been known to developmental biologists for decades. Its role in control of stem cell proliferation has now been demonstrated for several cell types including haematopoietic, neural and mammary[1] stem cells. Components of the Notch pathway have been proposed to act as oncogenes in mammary[1] and other tumors.
Sonic hedgehog and Wnt
These developmental pathways are also strongly implicated as stem cell regulators.[1] Both Sonic hedgehog(SHH) and Wnt pathways are commonly hyperactivated in tumors and are required to sustain tumor growth. However, the Gli transcription factors that are regulated by SHH take their name from gliomas, where they are commonly expressed at high levels. A degree of crosstalk exists between the two pathways and their activation commonly goes hand-in-hand.[1] This is a trend rather than a rule. For instance, in colon cancer hedgehog signalling appears to antagonise Wnt.[1]
Sonic hedgehog blockers are available, such as cyclopamine. There is also a new water soluble cyclopamine that may be more effective in cancer treatment. There is also DMAPT, a water soluble derivative of parthenolide that targets AML (leukemia) stem cells, and possibly other cancer stem cells as in myeloma or prostate cancer. A clinical trial of DMAPT is to start in England in late 2007 or 2008. Furthermore, GRN163L was recently started in trials to target myeloma stem cells. If it is possible to eliminate the cancer stem cell, than a potential cure may be achieved if there are no more cancer stem cells to repopulate a cancer.
External links
- "Cancer Stem Cell Scientific Literature Review", UMDNJ Stem Cell Research and Regenerative Medicine, June 17, 2006
- "Stem cells may cause some forms of bone cancer", News-Medical.Net, December 7, 2005
- "The Bad Seed: Rare stem cells appear to drive cancers", Science News Online, March 20, 2004
- "The Real Problem in Breast Tumors: Cancer Stem Cells", Genome News Network, March 7, 2003
- Stem Cell and Cord Blood information database
References
Stem cells |
|---|
Sources: Embryonic stem cells | Adult stem cells | Cancer stem cells Related articles: Stem cell treatments | Stem cell controversy | Stem cell line | Progenitor cell | Cellular differentiation |
de:Krebsstammzelleit:Cellula staminale tumorale ja:がん幹細胞
Acknowledgement and Attribution Regarding Sources of Content
Some of the initial content on this page may be incorporated in part from copyleft sources in the public domain including wikis such as Wikipedia and AskDrWiki. Drug information for patients came from the The National Library of Medicine. Infectious disease information may have come from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Differential Diagnoses are drawn from clinicians as well as an amalgamation of 3 sources: 1.The Disease Database; 2. Kahan, Scott, Smith, Ellen G. In A Page: Signs and Symptoms. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2004:3; 3. Sailer, Christian, Wasner, Susanne. Differential Diagnosis Pocket. Hermosa Beach, CA: Borm Bruckmeir Publishing LLC, 2002:7 .
