Failure analysis

You don't need to be Editor-In-Chief to add or edit content to WikiDoc. You can begin to add to or edit text on this WikiDoc page by clicking on the edit button at the top of this page. Next enter or edit the information that you would like to appear here. Once you are done editing, scroll down and click the Save page button at the bottom of the page.

Jump to: navigation, search

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Phone:617-525-6884

Please Take Over This Page and Apply to be Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [2] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.

Failure analysis is the process of collecting and analyzing data to determine the cause of a failure and how to prevent it from recurring. It is an important discipline in many branches of manufacturing industry, such as the electronics industry, where it is a vital tool used in the development of new products and for the improvement of existing products.

Forensic investigation

The main principle of failure analysis is a forensic inquiry into the process or product upon the failure. Such inquiry can be conducted using scientific analytical methods such as electrical and mechanical measurements, or through speculative approach when the data is not available but an action has to be taken. A good example of a speculative approach is analysis of an aircraft crashes where the evidence has been mostly destroyed but all parties are expecting corrective action. In such cases, one or more of the most viable theories are being implemented until an additional data is available. Of course even in the speculative approach the principles of scientific analysis are being applied to the extent possible by the existing clues and pieces of information, and only the missing information is supplemented by speculative approach in order to form a working model or hypothesis.

Another interesting aspect of failure analysis is associated with No Fault Found (NFF) which is a term used in the field of failure analysis to describe a situation where an originally reported mode of failure can't be duplicated by the evaluating technician and therefore the potential defect can't be fixed.

NFF can be attributed to oxidation, defective connections of electrical components, temporary shorts or opens in the circuits, software bugs, temporary environmental factors, but also to the operator error. Large number of devices that are reported as NFF during the first troubleshooting session often return to the failure analysis lab with the same NFF symptoms or a permanent mode of failure.

The term Failure analysis also applies to other fields such as business management and military strategy.

Methods of analysis

The failure analysis of many different products involves the use of the following tools and techniques:

Microscopes

Sample Preparation

Spectroscopic Analysis

Device Modification

Surface Analysis

Scanning Electron Microscopy

Laser Signal Injection Microscopy (LSIM)

Semiconductor Probing

Software Based Fault Location Techniques

See also

References

Failure analysis of integrated circuits
A review of failure analysis
Subject reference
Reference to the terminology
Article on the subject at IEEE archive
Finite Element Implementation of Advanced Failure Criteria for Composites

Bibliography

  • Martin, Perry L., Electronic Failure Analysis Handbook, McGraw-Hill Professional; 1st edition (February 28, 1999) ISBN 0-07-041044-5.
  • Microelectronics Failure Analysis, ASM International; Fifth Edition (2004) ISBN 0-87170-804-3


it:Analisi dei guasti


WikiDoc Help Menu

Quick Start..

Editing basics

Advanced editing

Communicating your edits

Help Videos You Can Watch


Acknowledgement and Attribution Regarding Sources of Content

Some of the initial content on this page may be incorporated in part from copyleft sources in the public domain including wikis such as Wikipedia and AskDrWiki. Drug information for patients came from the The National Library of Medicine. Infectious disease information may have come from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Differential Diagnoses are drawn from clinicians as well as an amalgamation of 3 sources: 1.The Disease Database; 2. Kahan, Scott, Smith, Ellen G. In A Page: Signs and Symptoms. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2004:3; 3. Sailer, Christian, Wasner, Susanne. Differential Diagnosis Pocket. Hermosa Beach, CA: Borm Bruckmeir Publishing LLC, 2002:7 .

Personal tools