Gravity (social science methodology)
You don't need to be Editor-In-Chief to add or edit content to WikiDoc. You can begin to add to or edit text on this WikiDoc page by clicking on the edit button at the top of this page. Next enter or edit the information that you would like to appear here. Once you are done editing, scroll down and click the Save page button at the bottom of the page.
Social science results are often subjected to meta analysis, which is a statistical procedure that combines the results of studies to produce an overall estimate of the effect size. The effect size is usually expressed as an odds ratio or a standardized difference between the means of two groups.
Debate is often centered around the inclusion or exclusion of some number of studies, which critics would like to see included or excluded. As studies are commonly weighted according to their sample size and/or their internal variability, Gee[1] proposed that jackknife methods[2] [3] could be used to examine study influence and detect outliers. By re-computing the meta-analysis once for each of k studies, where each study is individually excluded, k results are obtained. The difference between the average of these k results and each study's individual result (when omitted) is taken as an index of "raw gravity." This difference, divided by the standard deviation of the k differences, may be taken as a Z-score, or "standardized gravity" that can be used to establish which studies might be unusually influential.
In the seminal article on the topic, Gee[4] also observed that this type of jackknifed meta-analysis is a special case in combinatorics wherein k objects (studies) are combined k-1 at a time, resulting in k estimates. The extension of this logic implies that it is possible to study the behaviour of meta-analytic indices through the more general approach of combinatorial meta analysis by computing results for k studies taken 1, 2, 3 ... k-1, k at a time.
Acknowledgement and Attribution Regarding Sources of Content
Some of the initial content on this page may be incorporated in part from copyleft sources in the public domain including wikis such as Wikipedia and AskDrWiki. Drug information for patients came from the The National Library of Medicine. Infectious disease information may have come from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Differential Diagnoses are drawn from clinicians as well as an amalgamation of 3 sources: 1.The Disease Database; 2. Kahan, Scott, Smith, Ellen G. In A Page: Signs and Symptoms. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2004:3; 3. Sailer, Christian, Wasner, Susanne. Differential Diagnosis Pocket. Hermosa Beach, CA: Borm Bruckmeir Publishing LLC, 2002:7 .
