Kleihauer-Betke test

You don't need to be Editor-In-Chief to add or edit content to WikiDoc. You can begin to add to or edit text on this WikiDoc page by clicking on the edit button at the top of this page. Next enter or edit the information that you would like to appear here. Once you are done editing, scroll down and click the Save page button at the bottom of the page.

Jump to: navigation, search

WikiDoc Resources for

Kleihauer-Betke test

Articles

Most recent articles on Kleihauer-Betke test

Most cited articles on Kleihauer-Betke test

Review articles on Kleihauer-Betke test

Articles on Kleihauer-Betke test in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ

Media

Powerpoint slides on Kleihauer-Betke test

Images of Kleihauer-Betke test

Photos of Kleihauer-Betke test

Podcasts & MP3s on Kleihauer-Betke test

Videos on Kleihauer-Betke test

Evidence Based Medicine

Cochrane Collaboration on Kleihauer-Betke test

Bandolier on Kleihauer-Betke test

TRIP on Kleihauer-Betke test

Clinical Trials

Ongoing Trials on Kleihauer-Betke test at Clinical Trials.gov

Trial results on Kleihauer-Betke test

Clinical Trials on Kleihauer-Betke test at Google

Guidelines / Policies / Govt

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Kleihauer-Betke test

NICE Guidance on Kleihauer-Betke test

NHS PRODIGY Guidance

FDA on Kleihauer-Betke test

CDC on Kleihauer-Betke test

Books

Books on Kleihauer-Betke test

News

Kleihauer-Betke test in the news

Be alerted to news on Kleihauer-Betke test

News trends on Kleihauer-Betke test

Commentary

Blogs on Kleihauer-Betke test

Definitions

Definitions of Kleihauer-Betke test

Patient Resources / Community

Patient resources on Kleihauer-Betke test

Discussion groups on Kleihauer-Betke test

Patient Handouts on Kleihauer-Betke test

Directions to Hospitals Treating Kleihauer-Betke test

Risk calculators and risk factors for Kleihauer-Betke test

Healthcare Provider Resources

Symptoms of Kleihauer-Betke test

Causes & Risk Factors for Kleihauer-Betke test

Diagnostic studies for Kleihauer-Betke test

Treatment of Kleihauer-Betke test

Continuing Medical Education (CME)

CME Programs on Kleihauer-Betke test

International

Kleihauer-Betke test en Espanol

Kleihauer-Betke test en Francais

Businness

Kleihauer-Betke test in the Marketplace

Patents on Kleihauer-Betke test

Experimental / Informatics

List of terms related to Kleihauer-Betke test

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Phone:617-525-6884

Please Take Over This Page and Apply to be Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [2] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.

The Kleihauer-Betke ("KB") test, Kleihauer-Betke ("KB") stain or Kleihauer test, is a blood test used to measure the amount of fetal hemoglobin transferred from a fetus to an Rh-negative mother's bloodstream.[1] The results of the test are used to determine the required dose of Rh immune globulin (RhIg) to inhibit formation of Rh antibodies in the mother and prevent Rh disease in future Rh-positive children.

In this test, hemoglobin is eluted from the mother's red blood cells, whereas the fetal hemoglobin is resistant to this acid elution. When the slides are stained, the maternal cells appear very pale, whereas fetal cells are stained and appear bright pink. Simple comparative counts allow an estimate of whether a significant fetal-maternal hemorrhage has occurred.

In those with positive tests (25% or more of estimated fetal blood volume lost), follow up testing (at a postpartum check) should be done to rule the possibility of a false positive because of a process, such as e.g. sickle cell trait, in the mother which causes persistent elevation of fetal hemoglobin.

The KB test is the standard method of detecting fetal-maternal hemorrhage (FMH). This takes advantage of the differential resistance of fetal hemoglobin to acid. A standard blood smear is prepared from the mother's blood. An acid bath is then used to remove all adult hemoglobin but does not remove fetal hemoglobin. Subsequent staining makes fetal cells (containing fetal hemoglobin) appear rose-pink in color, while adult cells are only seen as 'ghosts'. A large number N \geq 5000 of cells are counted under the microscope and a ratio of fetal to maternal cells generated.

Comparison with other more expensive or technologically advanced methods such as flow cytometry has shown that the KB stain, like the more advanced methods, is sensitive in its detection of FMH.[1] Background counting errors can result in estimates of as much as 5 ml fetal blood loss when there actually is no such blood loss, but standard methods available in most laboratories admit an extremely low probability of the return of a false positive when more severe FMH has taken place.

Estimating the Severity of FMH

To determine if a positive test for FMH should be considered as the likely cause of fetal death, the percent of total fetal blood volume lost should be calculated, making appropriate adjustments based on the following known relationships:

    • the size of a fetal red blood cell is 1.22 times that of an adult red blood cell;
    • the KB stain is known to have a mean success rate of 92% in detecting fetal red blood cells;
    • in a woman at or near term in her pregnancy, the mean volume of maternal red blood cells is approximately 1800 ml;
    • the mean fetal hematocrit is 50%; and
    • at stillbirth, the mean fetal blood volume is 150 \frac{ml}{kg}

These constraints can then be applied to yield the formula

PFB = \frac{(3200)(FC)}{(FW)(MC)}

where

    • PFB is the percentage of fetal blood lost;
    • FC is the observed number of fetal red blood cells;
    • MC is the observed number of maternal red blood cells (N.B. we have that MC = TCFC, where TC is the total observed number of red blood cells, both maternal and fetal);
    • FW is the stillbirth weight of the fetus in kilograms.

An Example of How This Formula is Used in Resolving a Stillbirth

Suppose that a KB stain is performed and TC = 5000 total red blood cells are observed, FC = 200 of which are found to be fetal red blood cells. Suppose further that the stillbirth weight of the fetus under consideration is FW = 2.0kg. Then we would conclude that the total percentage of fetal blood lost is approximately

PFB = \frac{(3200)(FC)}{(FW)(MC)} = \frac{(3200)(200)}{(2.0)(4800)} = \frac{200}{3} = 66.667

to five significant digits. We would hence conclude that the fetus under consideration lost 66.667% (two thirds) of its blood via FMH. Generally, stillbirth is highly probable for any value of PFB \geq 20, particularly if the fetus abruptly loses this much blood; in this example, we would hence be likely to suspect FMH as the cause of the stillbirth. It is important to note, however, that such a diagnosis is still not completely conclusive; fetuses losing large quantities of blood over long periods of time are able to compensate for this slower blood loss; since the KB stain tells us nothing with regard to the level of acuity of FMH. This means that it is not possible to entirely correlate a positive KB stain and high PFB with a stillbirth, though in many cases, such as the stillbirth of Breanna Lynn Bartlett-Stewart in 2000, given other information, such as known hereditary complications of pregnancy, extremely high positive correlation coefficients r \approx +1.000 between FMH and stillbirth have been observed.

Problems in the Detection of Fetal Red Blood Cells

Since fetal and maternal blood cells have the same life expectancy in the maternal bloodstream, it is possible to obtain informative results from a KB stain for a fair period of time after a stillbirth. However, if the mother and fetus are ABO incompatible, it is more crucial to quickly perform the KB stain following a stillbirth, as the fetal red blood cells will be eliminated from the maternal bloodstream very quickly, causing the KB stain to underestimate the degree of FMH, if any.

Lots of concern has been raised in the literature concerning false positives when sampling is done after delivery. In general this is not a problem. Delivery does result in higher frequency of detection of micro-hemorrhages but this should not confound interpretation of FMH as a possible cause of stillbirth. It is not necessary to draw the sample before induction, onset of labor, delivery, placental delivery etc. despite what some published literature purports. However, if caesarean section is to be used, failure to draw the sample prior to that will result in a 2% false positive rate.

Finally, anything which causes persistence of fetal hemoglobin in maternal blood cells will make interpretation much trickier. Certain hemoglobinopathies, the most common of which is sickle cell trait, do this. Overall, somewhere around 1-3% of the time this could result in false interpretation.

Breanna Lynn Bartlett-Stewart, stillborn on September 6, 2000 in Paragould, Arkansas to Scott Stewart and Lisa Bartlett, was the first example of a stillbirth whose cause was successfully resolved via the Kleihauer-Betke test.

References


fr:Test de Kleihauer
WikiDoc Help Menu

Quick Start..

Editing basics

Advanced editing

Communicating your edits

Help Videos You Can Watch


Acknowledgement and Attribution Regarding Sources of Content

Some of the initial content on this page may be incorporated in part from copyleft sources in the public domain including wikis such as Wikipedia and AskDrWiki. Drug information for patients came from the The National Library of Medicine. Infectious disease information may have come from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Differential Diagnoses are drawn from clinicians as well as an amalgamation of 3 sources: 1.The Disease Database; 2. Kahan, Scott, Smith, Ellen G. In A Page: Signs and Symptoms. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2004:3; 3. Sailer, Christian, Wasner, Susanne. Differential Diagnosis Pocket. Hermosa Beach, CA: Borm Bruckmeir Publishing LLC, 2002:7 .

Personal tools