Monophyly
You don't need to be Editor-In-Chief to add or edit content to WikiDoc. You can begin to add to or edit text on this WikiDoc page by clicking on the edit button at the top of this page. Next enter or edit the information that you would like to appear here. Once you are done editing, scroll down and click the Save page button at the bottom of the page.
 |
It has been suggested that this article or section be merged into Phylogenetics. (Discuss) |
In phylogenetics, a group is monophyletic (Greek: "of one race") if it consists of an inferred common ancestor and all its descendants. A taxonomic group that contains organisms but not their common ancestor is called polyphyletic, and a group that contains some but not all descendants of the most recent common ancestor is called paraphyletic.
For example, all organisms in the genus Homo are inferred to have come from the same ancestral form in the family Hominidae, and no other descendants are known. Thus the genus Homo is monophyletic. If, on the other hand, it were discovered that Homo habilis had developed from a different ancestor than Homo sapiens, and this ancestor were not included in the genus, then the genus would be polyphyletic. Biologists tend to prefer groups that are monophyletic, so in this case they would likely either split the genus or broaden it to include the additional forms. Splitting the genus may split explanations of functional evolution that would otherwise require convergence.
Some evolutionary taxonomists prefer to use the term holophyletic to describe this sort of group and instead use monophyletic in its older sense, where it refers to both holophyletic and paraphyletic groups.
Sometimes taxonomists are frustrated fitting plant species into a monophyletic group because of polyploidy. There is evidence that some polyploid plant species are of multiple origins (the species has arisen more than once). For example, hybrid goat's-beard (Tragopogon miscellus [1]) has formed as many as 20 times via hybrid speciation in eastern Washington. Unity of explanation through functional evolution is challenged by the atomizations required by strict monophyly.
See also
References
cs:Monofyletismus da:Fylogenetisk systematik de:Kladistik#Verwandtschaftsverh.C3.A4ltnisse et:Monofüleetiline rühmfr:Monophylétique it:Monofiletico he:מונופילטיות hu:Monofiletikus nl:Monofyletisch ja:単系統群 nn:Monofyletisk gruppesimple:Monophyletic sv:Monofyletisk vi:Đơn ngành wa:Monofiletike uk:Монофілія
Acknowledgement and Attribution Regarding Sources of Content
Some of the initial content on this page may be incorporated in part from copyleft sources in the public domain including wikis such as Wikipedia and AskDrWiki. Drug information for patients came from the The National Library of Medicine. Infectious disease information may have come from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Differential Diagnoses are drawn from clinicians as well as an amalgamation of 3 sources: 1.The Disease Database; 2. Kahan, Scott, Smith, Ellen G. In A Page: Signs and Symptoms. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2004:3; 3. Sailer, Christian, Wasner, Susanne. Differential Diagnosis Pocket. Hermosa Beach, CA: Borm Bruckmeir Publishing LLC, 2002:7 .
