Transfusion of blood stored for more than 14 days increases mortality among cardiac surgical patients
You don't need to be Editor-In-Chief to add or edit content to WikiDoc. You can begin to add to or edit text on this WikiDoc page by clicking on the edit button at the top of this page. Next enter or edit the information that you would like to appear here. Once you are done editing, scroll down and click the Save page button at the bottom of the page.
March 20, 2008 By Vijayalakshmi Kunadian MBBS MD MRCP [1]
Cleveland: Researchers have demonstrated that administration of blood that has been stored for more than 14 days during cardiac surgery is associated with increased in-hospital and long term mortality.
Advances in technology in recent years have made blood transfusion a safe procedure in terms of reduction in transmission of infectious disease through blood products. Although there is reduction in infectious diseases, previous studies among patients who have sustained trauma and critically ill patients suggest that blood transfusion is associated with increased mortality, shock severity and sepsis.
During cardiac surgery, nearly half of the patient population receive blood transfusion (around 1-2 units on an average). A number of factors impact the outcome following cardiac surgeries. In the recent issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, Koch and colleagues from the Cleveland clinic determined if administration of blood older than 14 days is associated with worse outcomes following cardiac surgery.
This study consisted of over 6000 patients who had undergone coronary artery bypass surgery, valve surgery or both from 30 June 1998 to 30 January 2006 in the Cleveland clinic. Patients were divided into two groups:
- Group 1: Those that received blood which was stored for 14 days or less (median 11 days) and
- Group 2: Those that received blood which was stored for more than 14 days (median 20 days).
Patients in group 1 (n=2872) received a total of 8 802 units of blood and those in group 2 (n=3130) received a total of 10 782 units of blood.
This study demonstrated that there was an increase in:
- In-hospital mortality (2.8% vs. 1.7%, p=0.004),
- Intubation duration >72 hours (9.7% vs. 5.6%, p<0.001),
- Renal failure (2.7% vs. 1.6%, p=0.003),
- Sepsis or septicemia (4% vs. 2.8%, p=0.01) among patients in group 2 compared to those in group 1.
The composite complications were also significantly high among those who received blood older than 14 days (25.9% vs. 22.4%, p=0.001). At one year, patients in group 2 had an increase in mortality compared to those is group 1 (11% vs. 7.4%, p<0.001). This finding remained significant despite correcting for confounding factors including blood group.
Although the Food and Drug Administration allows storage of red blood cells up to 42 days, this study demonstrates the detrimental outcomes associated with the use of old blood among cardiac surgical patients. A number of potential reasons have been speculated for this association including loss of viability and red cell function as a result of progressive structural and functional changes when blood is stored for a long period of time.
Given the association of increased mortality with old blood, this study reiterates the importance of examining the need for blood transfusion during cardiac surgery. Whether reuse of shed blood during surgery and the use of blood substitutes would improve outcomes following cardiac surgery is not clear.
Source
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/358/12/1229
Acknowledgement and Attribution Regarding Sources of Content
Some of the initial content on this page may be incorporated in part from copyleft sources in the public domain including wikis such as Wikipedia and AskDrWiki. Drug information for patients came from the The National Library of Medicine. Infectious disease information may have come from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Differential Diagnoses are drawn from clinicians as well as an amalgamation of 3 sources: 1.The Disease Database; 2. Kahan, Scott, Smith, Ellen G. In A Page: Signs and Symptoms. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 2004:3; 3. Sailer, Christian, Wasner, Susanne. Differential Diagnosis Pocket. Hermosa Beach, CA: Borm Bruckmeir Publishing LLC, 2002:7 .

